We're so dysfunctional!

We're so dysfunctional! Typical voter doesn't want to pay any taxes- but wants everything the government has to offer--medicaid and social security, an army to fight terrorists world-wide; your average vested interest/banker/chamber of commerce person wants everything the govt has to offer--agricultural subsidies, corporate subsidies, a ever-ready federal bank to help to Wall street when it fails, job creation abroad,an army to fight terrorists, and on and on.

So many interests! No way to keep everyone happy.

Which nation is the most corrupt?

Folks are claiming that Afghanistan is the most corrupt place on the planet-- I vote for the good ole USA. Here in the land of the quick buck and glad hand, politicians are routinely bought (75 million for a president, 10 million for a senator, 3 million for a house member), statistics massaged and gamed (NYS standardized school testing results), defective products sold (Wall Street sells junk mortgages as AAA rated securities might be the biggest and most costly scam ever)

And, as HL Mencken correctly observed: no one even went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.

There's nothing standard about standarized scores--or why you can't trust the scores schools report

Seeing Geoffrey Canada featured in the pro-charter schools documentary, “Waiting for Superman”, and then reading about his richly-endowed, superbly staffed, 11 month a year operation, Harlem Children’s zone schools so-so educational achievements, (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/education/13harlem.html New York Times, Oct 1s) left this ex-Harlem public school teacher wondering what was wrong with his approach and what more needs to be done to improve our schools.

We can all agree that we have some serious school problems, particularly when it comes to Black, Hispanic and immigrant students: 50% dropout rates in urban high schools and standardized scores in reading and math 50% below that of white and Asian students. While many can agree that there is a problem, there is no agreement as to what the solution may be. Better teachers? More charters? Less unions? Or what?

What makes schools successful? Good teachers are a necessary but not sufficient part, despite all the trashing teacher unions get, there is some evidence that unions seem to be important (southern public schools generally do not have unionized teachers and score lower compared to northern schools that do have unionized teachers. Moreover, Finland, the country everyone raves about as having the number one educational system has both teacher unions and tenure.) Charters -in general, 4 out of 5 charters do not outperform public schools and here in Boston, the 4 charter high schools have dropout rates of 50%.

Harlem Children’s Zones poor to average standardized test results raises questions about standardized tests and their reliability. Previous to the 2010 New York State test, (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/11/education/11scores.html New York Times, Oct. 10^th) the zone did fabulously well-researchers claimed that the Zone’s Harlem students even outperformed the tony students in Scarsdale, NY. In 2010 the state changed the test—raised the number of correct answers to pass the test and, more dramatically, no longer distributed the test questions, which remained basically the same year after year. The implication is that teachers had the test questions and simply taught them to the students and that’s why the students did so well. Moreover, there is a long history of educational research that suggests that high-stakes testing leads to massive massage of the data. In other words, cheating. If your job is on the line or bonus might be coming your way as a result of a test, there is all the reason to change test results in your favor.

How about affordable housing and stable jobs for parents? It's no small thing that there is a high correlation between SAT scores and family income, heck, there is high correlation between zip codes and SAT scores. The richer the parents, and hence the better neighborhood they live in, the better the score. Many a college admissions officer has followed this simple rubric.

For the most part, our so-called "failing schools" occur in impoverished minority/immigrant parts of the urban landscape. That should tell you something; poverty can have a debilitating impact on educational achievement ! Students of poverty move often, have poor job prospects and, as a result, often drop out. High school drop-out rates in urban high schools in often 50%.

Give parents jobs, provide affordable housing, provide a career path for impoverished students and you have the means of solving the problem. Who will pay for it? Many well to do philanthropists are now pouring money into “failing schools.” So far, they have not come up with the right solution to the problem. A jobs and housing program might be just such a solution.

Elena Kagan, Obama's nominee for the Supreme Court

What, no Protestants on the court? Only Catholics and Jews? Chief Justice Marshall must be turning in his grave--serves him right for allowing the court to deem laws unconstitutional. Perhaps this is the time to go back to democracy! No monarch (Obama, Bush, et. al.), no House of Lords (Schumer, McCain, et. al.), just a House of Representatives expanded to 1 member for every 30,000 population--as it was in the beginning. (Actually, the only people who don't want democracy are the truly rich--the Blankfein's, the Gates’s, et. al. ) However, the rich have so royally screwed up this country, that it's time to let Jefferson's rabble rule!

Oil rig in gulf explodes and causes environmental and economic devatation

Oil coming out all over the Gulf? New Orleans vulnerable--sounds like old times. And heck, the oil companies couldn't care less what happens to New Orleans, the oysters, the whales, the birds or the rest of us.

This is the problem with oligarchy--AKA, rich rule. BP don't care a hoot about anything except making their money. Hopefully they'll lose a pile in the gulf and capitalism's "creative destruction" will kick in --oil companies like BP and Haliburton (Take Dick Cheney with you) will go down.I'm not getting my hopes up too high as I know that these firms and Wall Street run the show in D. C. But anything that takes the wind out of the oligarch's sails is good with me.

Our economy and its discontents...

Can the SEC protect us from the scandalous behavior of Goldman-Sachs? Sure, they can fine the firm but Goldman-Sachs's misdeeds are inherent in the way business is done in our economy and will not go away.

Read on---There seem to be two seemingly intractable problems involved in solving our economic woes:

First. Making money the derivatives/gambling casino way is easy money--much easier than the Henry Ford way of large plants, massive work force, harnessing of natural resources --iron, coal, rubber. Currently, nearly half of corporate profits are made in the financial sector. The money men of today sit at computers and make millions betting on the price of oil futures, the housing market and even how long your mother-in-law might live. They are not going to be later day Henry Fords.

Secondly, Wall Street owns the government. If need be, banking billionaires run circles around a $400,000 a year president and the millionaire senators.

So, our bankers are addicted to easy money and they run the show. Now what? Like other addicted to easy money former financial powers --the Dutch, Spain and England--we're heading for tier two status. Which might not be so bad. It will give us a chance to become a kinder, gentler nation, one that takes care of its own, rather than trying to stamp out "evil" in the world.

Charter schools its discontents

Charters don't work--it's that simple!

Charters and its discontents.

News item:

Rhode Island H.S dismisses all teachers and staff in an effort to turn-around a failing school.

The school in question, Central Falls H.S in Rhode Island, situated in a poor minority community with high student transfer rates, has a disappointing 48% rate of graduation.

In this regard it is no different from the rates of most urban high schools and even the rates of the four charter high schools in Boston. Remarkably, even though the Boston Charters get to select their own teachers and students, they do not best the public schools. Diane Ravitch, the leading scholar of the school reform movement and long a critic who argued for choice, charters, merit pay and accountability , no longer feels that way. “Charter schools, she concluded, were proving to be no better on average than regular schools, but in many cities were bleeding resources from the public system. Testing had become not just a way to measure student learning, but an end in itself. New York Times, (Scholar’s School Reform U-Turn Shakes Up Debate By Sam Dillon, Published: March 2, 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/03/education/03ravitch.html?scp=2&sq=diane%20ravitch&st=cse... See More

If charters, etc. don’t work their magic on impoverished communities, what might? There has long been a correlation between parents income and student achievement (See SAT scores). In this regard, A good jobs program, when everything else fails, might well prove to be the royal road to educational excellence.

“Disadvantaged children have been cemented into an underclass by third-rate schools” argues the New York Times' Nicholas Kristof in a recent op-ed entitled, “Democrats and Schools.” Teacher Unions and the impossible-to-get-rid-of-bad teachers are the villains and charter schools are the good guys. But let’s wait a minute before we clean out the Augean stables.

In a recent Boston Globe story, it was reported that half of Boston’s Charter school high school students fail to graduate, and, according the Kathleen McCartney, Dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education , this is same as the public school rate for urban high schools . Moreover, we have the recent Stanford University study reporting that charter schools do not outperform public schools. This part is really odd, given that the charters cherry-pick their students and teachers. It seems that the "whiz kids" who teach in the charters are no better at their task than the "unionized dinosaurs" in the public schools.

Yet, charters have their fans as well as many parent advocates. Since it is not about academics, it must be about atmospherics. As parent-involvement is a must at the charters, a well-behaved student body will be evident (as any unruly are sent back to the public schools). With the charter movement, we seem to be on the road to a two-track public school system—raucous, underfunded publics and the well-mannered charters. And this just might be the beginning of the dismantling and privatizing of the public schools. And we will still be left with disadvantaged youths.

Schools--what is to be done?

What's up with the schools and no child left behind?

International education expert says US "Schools are inheriting an over entertained, distracted student." hmmn

A Senate panel learned that more students in more countries graduate from high school and college and score higher on achievement tests than students in the United States.

So that's it. US student's minds are not in the classroom (their minds are on hand-held devices) and are too damn twitchy. Just as I thought.

So what's the answer? One answer is to keep the politicians away from the schools. The other answer is to ask: "Do we need smart"? Probably not. Rich can always buy smart from anywhere in the world. Also, since we've left manufacturing behind, how smart do you have to be to sell sub-prime mortgages or credit default swaps? It's not a lack of smarties that are leading us to 2nd tierdom; it is the rich-ies who can't stop gorging themselves on the financial sector that is leading us there.

But what about charter schools, another gleam in the eye of the "we'd rather fiddle than watch Rome burn" crowd? Charters are no better on average than the public schools, report scholars at Stanford U. and Diane Ravitch.

So we're left with the public schools: love them or leave them. I say leave them alone--they're doing the best they can with what they've got to work with.

New from the old Bronx

A friend sent me news of the old neighborhood:

Bernie N. was taking out the garbage at his father's slum-lord house when the kindergarten pictures were being taken.

Pookie Beck now owns a candy store in the middle of Broadway

Freddie the cop's gun went off when he tripped over Muck when he fell off his 3 wheeler and a bullet hit Nora bad breath and chipped her tooth.

Sam Senzar was seen just last week still standing on the corner, or on the coroner.

Off the shoulder is now walking Lenny the Dog Walker.

Raymond Berr's mother is still looking for a nice girl for her son.

Donniel Zing has never been found. Still lost in the basement in the coops as it's believed that we are still playing cops and robbers.

Fixing Wall Street will be a steep uphill climb...

Fixing Wall Street will be a steep uphill climb, but I applaud all those who are trying.

Obama's single biggest contributor to his campaign was Goldman-Sachs--sometimes called Government-Sachs for its ability to run our country. Potential saviors like Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd also receive piles of money from the banks.

More woe--Geithner and Bernanke represent the banking industry. The problem with Wall Street is an intrinsic one--what's good for them is bad for the rest of us. To wit: the banks make gobs of money quickly through investing in speculative activities--oil prices, housing market prices (ups and down), Greece, etc. This is the leading/bleeding edge in banking circles. Lending to businesses is so yesterday; derivatives and credit default swaps so today.

Regulations of any sort will rain on Wall Street’s parade--whether it be transparency in derivatives sales, stopping the ratings fraudulence in securitization, lowering bank leverage or stopping banks from trading/gambling with taxpayer money.

So Obama, Geithner and Bernanke and Dodd and Frank et al. will go through the motions of banking reform but at the end of the day will have the same old financial system--that is to say, primed for disaster. (Something tells me that the bankers see this as a thrilling rush....) I’d say that after the next disaster we will be quite ready to dump Wall Street.

News item: Obama visits Kabul.

President Obama pressed President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan to crack down on corruption while strengthening the judicial system and promoting good governance, and he invited him to Washington.

Onward Christian soldiers in the Muslim Middle East. (Bound to be a losing cause). So, Mr. Obama, we continue our efforts to make the Middle East safe for Israel and safe for our oil and gas supplies. Big mistake. At best this is huge drain on our treasury and, at worst, a losing proposition--we will never make the Middle East safe for Israel. As we fiddle endlessly, Wall Street is still running its gambling casino and is bound to come up short once again...and our overextended world reach will topple us.

Say no to Israeli take-over of Palestinian lands

Considering we give in the neighborhood of 10 billion a year to Israel (20% of the Israeli budget)and given that the Palestinians are losing their land at a sickening pace, it's time to say "no" to Israel and its settlers.

Settlers now comprise 1/4th of Israel's population. They are a powerful bloc; much admired by the rest of the country for their "pioneering" spirit. They provide the push for Israel’s illegal (see UN resolutions, Geneva Convention) expansions. The only way to stop Israel from taking over all of the "Palestine Mandate" (Israel now has 80% of the land both parties were supposed to share, and it grows larger every day ) is for the US to pull the financial plug.

The US gives Israel--over 10 billion a year (approx. 1/5th of the Israeli budget)--3 billion direct, military loans that are never repaid, tax free giving by US citizens, etc. Cutting this subsidy will, hopefully, bring Israel to its senses, if not, we will have succeeded in not enabling their land grabbing and crushing of the Palestinians

Schools--what is to be done?

What's up with the schools and no child left behind?


International education expert says US "Schools are inheriting an over entertained, distracted student."

A Senate panel learned that more students in more countries graduate from high school and college and score higher on achievement tests than students in the United States.

So that's it. US student's minds are not in the classroom (their minds are on hand-held devices) and are too damn twitchy. Just as I thought.


So what's the answer? One answer is to keep the politicians away from the schools. The other answer is to ask: "Do we need smart"? Probably not. Rich can always buy smart from anywhere in the world. Also, since we've left manufacturing behind, how smart do you have to be to sell sub-prime mortgages or credit default swaps? It's not a lack of smarties that are leading us to 2nd tierdom; it is the rich-ies who can't stop gorging themselves on the financial sector that is leading us there.

But what about charter schools, another gleam in the eye of the "we'd rather fiddle than watch Rome burn" crowd? Charters are no better on average than the public schools, report scholars at Stanford U. and Diane Ravitch.

So we're left with the public schools: love them or leave them. I say leave them alone--they're doing the best they can with what they've got to work with.

Debt and its discontented

US government debt was worse in the decades following WW2--120% of GDP. To reach that point we would have to have 18 trillion dollars of current US debt. We're short of that by a couple of trillion.

Recall, that the decades following the war were some of our more robust economic times, before Reaganomics reduced our tax base by giving tax cuts to the rich. Years of Bushnomics and Clintonomics further eroded our tax base. Foreign wars and a trillion dollar a year military are further putting us into a hole. What the economy needs is spending--since business is reluctant to spend and consumers are reluctant to spend—the US government must be the spender of last resort. And spend we must to get us out of the hole we're in. (What hole?-- 18 million under- and unemployed, massive housing foreclosures, an economy that is speculation/investment-centric rather than manufacturing-centric.) So, raise high the debt and watch the good times roll once more. Once our ship is righted, we can pay down the debt, and restore the tax cuts for the rich and start manufacturing again and reduce the powers of true rulers of our country--the huge Wall Street banks.

Goldman Sachs leads us off the cliff!

“Goldman stood to gain from the housing market’s implosion because in late 2006, the firm had begun to make huge trades that would pay off if the mortgage market soured. The further mortgage securities’ prices fell, the greater were Goldman’s profits.” From Today’s Times 2/7/10

Goldman-Sachs placed bets that the housing market would tank, made a fortune when it did tank, and then took billions more in the government bailout. Who is this beast?

Goldman Sachs--aka Government Sachs, aka the place that does God's work, bled AIG dry? And then the government gave them even more money? It all proves one thing: G-S runs the government and probably the world.They make their money selling illusions and bubbles. They make nothing real. These illusionists control our economy and since they own the royal road to riches and are holding on tightly, they are leading the rest of us lemmings over the cliff.

Get rid of the Supremes as well!

This is too rich! Corporations can now buy elections (is this new?) With this latest court ruling, corporate right -wing extremist, activist justices have overturned precedent and 100 years of settled law. The Supreme Court, originally not supposed to rule on whether laws are constitutional or not (thank you Chief Justice Marshall);now rule. Yet another branch of government that is not responsive to the needs of the people. Get rid of them!

While we're still at it, abolish the filibuster and the Senate as well. Not only can a minority of Senators filibuster a bill to death, not only is the senate an unrepresentative body where the Senator from Montana (750,000 population) has an equal voice with the senator from California (38 million population); not only do senators act as paid shills for the mighty corporations that truly run this country; not only that these senators are millionaires many times over; not only were they put in the Constitution to stop the will of the majority--these folks, are, for the ,most part vapid, soulless creatures.

While we're at it--might as well abolish the Senate--have a unicameral legislature like Nebraska, with only a house of representatives. Rich folks are afraid of popular rule but they need it for their own good because our empire is going down with their continued misrule!

Get rid of the filibuster;get rid of the Senate!

Not only can a minority of Senators filibuster a bill to death, not only is the senate an unrepresentative body where the Senator from Montana (750,000 population) has an equal voice with the senator from California (38 million population); not only do senators act as paid shills for the mighty corporations that truly run this country; not only that these senators are millionaires many times over; not only were they put in the Constitution to stop the will of the majority--these folks, are, for the ,most part vapid, soulless creatures.

My solution--abolish the Senate--have a unicameral legislature like Nebraska, with only a house of representatives. Rich folks are afraid of popular rule but they need it for their own good because our empire is going down with their continued misrule!

Stamping out evil the Obama way

Sounds like Obama is revving up for the long, endless war--the one to end evil in the world. Good luck Mr. President! Obama will show those Republicans! He can morph into a Cheney, a Bush, whoever. But wait a minute--those guys failed--they didn't stamp out evil, they provided a role model and then encouraged it.

So now, we will connect the dots. Half a million people on a no-fly list--we will know their every movement. A billion Muslims in the world- we now know who you are.

If we didn't have the Democratic vs. Republican dynamic could we create a sensible policy in regard to evil or, as we prefer, the Muslim evil? Maybe we're wrong trying to stamp out evil , maybe we're not the shining city on the hill, maybe we should look into our own souls and not try to rule the world--after all, it's a big job and many of our betters have failed at it.

Coakley vs. Brown in Massachusetts

Martha Coakley is dull and boring, just what you would expect from a DA. Plus, she ran a charisma-less, lackluster campaign. Dems in Mass had a chance to support Rep. Capuano, a far more exciting and left of center figure, but they went for Coakley instead. Obama's health care reform is dragging down her numbers. Women were her strongest suit. Hopefully they will come out en masse for her.

Of course, Obama and his so-called health reform bill has been a disaster. Enough people are unhappy with it. He should have stayed with a jobs program. After all, if you had to choose one, what would you prefer--a job or health care?

Rebuild Haiti!

Turn Haiti into a model country! Get the world's best thinkers, builders, planners, etc. to create a country that has an economy, trees, rebar structures, trade unhampered by the IMF and the World Bank--i.e. allow it to protect (tariff) it's commodities.
Empower it's people to run the place--not the wealthy who run/ruin the place now. Bringing back Aristide(too populist for the US) would be a good first step.
Of course it will take tons on money. Since France and the US worked hard to enfeeble the country (Jefferson was afraid that the slave revolts in Haiti would encourage the slaves to revolt in the US so he punished the Haitians, as did France, as did Rush Limbaugh)--it is only right that these countries help build a new self-sustaining Haiti!

Wall Street Crime of the Century

The Wall Street Crime of the Century was repackaging junk, getting the rating agencies to relabel it as AAA and then selling it as gold. Old story--buy cheap ,sell dear--with the added element of fraud. Obama never pursued the Crime of the Century. He was, sad to say, part of the cover-up--by putting Summers and Geithner in place-he put Wall Street's lobbyists on his team.

And you can't blame the Crime solely on Bush's efforts at deregulation. Bill Clinton signed the damned deregulation bill, Summers and Rubin were his henchmen.

We have a 2 party system here but they both are subservient to Wall Street.